WebFeb 24, 1997 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. McKEESPORT MUNICIPAL WATER AUTHORITY, a municipal authority, Appellant, v. Harry J. McCLOSKEY and the City of McKeesport. Decided: February 24, 1997 Before KELLEY and LEADBETTER, JJ., and NARICK, Senior Judge. Larry A. Silverman, Pittsburgh, for appellant. WebCOMMONWEALTH OF : NO. 03-10,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : MICHAEL W. McCLOSKEY,: Defemdant’s Amended Post Conviction Defendant: Relief Act Petition …
COMMONWEALTH v. McCLOSKEY 234 Pa.Super. 577 …
WebCommonwealth v. Seibert, 424 Pa. Super. 242, 622 A.2d 361 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1993), as requested by the Defendant; and (4) the Court’s decision to charge the jury, with respect to specific intent, in the context of its instruction on first degree murder from Pa. SSJI (Crim.) 15-2502A instead of how it was defined/explained in Commonwealth v. WebAnother case somewhat in point on the facts is Commonwealth v. McCloskey, Appellant, 1970, 217 Pa. Super. 432, 272 A.2d 271. There the court reversed a student's marijuana conviction because the policemen who entered his dormitory room to execute a search warrant did not knock or announce their presence and purpose before entering. top ten chips in america
Piazzola v. Watkins, 442 F.2d 284 Casetext Search + Citator
WebAnother case somewhat in point on the facts is Commonwealth v. McCloskey, Appellant, 1970, 217 Pa. Super. 432, 272 A.2d 271. There the court reversed a student's marijuana conviction because the policemen who entered his dormitory room to execute a search warrant did not knock or announce their presence and purpose before entering. WebJun 24, 1975 · Commonwealth v. Willard, 179 Pa.Super. 368, 116 A.2d 751 (1955), represents the broadest statement of what constitutes mere preparation. In Willard, this … WebThe Commonwealth argues that the McCloskey instructions are not based on the Miranda case, supra, and Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), and *252 therefore the McCloskey decision should be interpreted by its own limiting statement above quoted as applying to a "layman" and this excludes an attorney from availing himself of the rights ... top ten christian movies on netflix